changes
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,50 +1,38 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: dispatching-parallel-agents
|
||||
description: Dispatch focused subagents in parallel for genuinely independent problem domains
|
||||
description: Safely parallelize independent lanes with isolation checks, explicit ownership, and single-agent integration
|
||||
permalink: opencode-config/skills/dispatching-parallel-agents/skill
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Dispatching Parallel Agents
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Value
|
||||
Use this skill before parallel fan-out.
|
||||
|
||||
When there are 2+ genuinely independent failures/problem domains, dispatch one focused agent per domain concurrently instead of serial investigation.
|
||||
## Isolation Test (Required)
|
||||
|
||||
## When to Use
|
||||
Parallel lanes are allowed only when lanes do not share:
|
||||
|
||||
Use when all are true:
|
||||
- You have multiple failures across separate domains.
|
||||
- Each domain can be investigated without shared context/state.
|
||||
- Agents can work without touching the same files or interfering.
|
||||
- files under active mutation
|
||||
- APIs or schemas being changed
|
||||
- verification steps that must run in sequence
|
||||
|
||||
Do **not** parallelize when:
|
||||
- Failures may share a root cause.
|
||||
- You still need a single root-cause investigation first.
|
||||
- Agents would edit the same area and conflict.
|
||||
If any of these overlap, run sequentially.
|
||||
|
||||
## Dispatch Pattern
|
||||
## Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
1. Split failures into independent domains.
|
||||
2. Write one prompt per domain.
|
||||
3. Dispatch subagents concurrently with the `task` tool.
|
||||
4. Review results, integrate non-conflicting fixes, then run full verification.
|
||||
1. Define lanes with explicit scope, inputs, and outputs.
|
||||
2. Assign a single integrator (usually builder) for merge and final validation.
|
||||
3. Require each lane to provide verification evidence, not just code output.
|
||||
4. Integrate in dependency order.
|
||||
5. Run final end-to-end verification after integration.
|
||||
|
||||
Example dispatch intent (tool-level wording):
|
||||
- `task`: "Investigate and fix failures in <domain A only>"
|
||||
- `task`: "Investigate and fix failures in <domain B only>"
|
||||
## Planner/Builder Expectations
|
||||
|
||||
## Prompt Quality Requirements
|
||||
- Planner: design parallel lanes only when isolation is demonstrable.
|
||||
- Builder: load this skill before fan-out and enforce lane boundaries strictly.
|
||||
|
||||
Each subagent prompt must include:
|
||||
1. **One clear problem domain** (single file/subsystem/failure cluster).
|
||||
2. **Self-contained context** (errors, failing tests, relevant constraints).
|
||||
3. **Explicit constraints** (what not to change; scope boundaries).
|
||||
4. **Explicit expected output** (root cause + files changed + validation run).
|
||||
## Red Flags
|
||||
|
||||
## Verification and Quality Pipeline
|
||||
|
||||
After subagents return:
|
||||
1. Check for overlapping edits or assumption conflicts.
|
||||
2. Run required verification for the integrated result (not partial checks).
|
||||
3. Send the feature through reviewer, then tester when behavior is user-facing.
|
||||
4. Do not claim completion without fresh verification evidence.
|
||||
- Two lanes editing the same contract.
|
||||
- Shared test fixtures causing non-deterministic outcomes.
|
||||
- Missing integrator ownership.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user